Small hills matter

A key battle of the Civil War was obviously the battle of Gettysburg , the high water mark of the Confederate Army.  A key part of the victory for the Union forces was maintaining the left flank at Little Round Top hill.  This effort was lead by a professor from Bowdoin College in Maine  Joshua Chamberlain . Joshua enlisted against the College’s desires as they already saw what a key individual he was for their school.  He was offered the head of the Maine regiment but declined and asked for a lesser position to learn the ropes.

 We can learn much from this decisive stand on a seemingly insignificant hill by a professor from Maine with no military experience prior to the war.

The pivotal day of the battle of Gettysburg was July 2, 1863.  The day before the Confederate Army had pushed the Union Army back through the town to outlying ridges. On July 2 the Confederate Army wished to continue this push and key would be able to flank the Union Army.  On the left flank was the 20th Maine regiment led by professor Chamberlain.  The Confederate Army was relentless on attack .  Chamberlains 20th Maine was short on ammo to the point they barley had a round left per member.  

It was at this point in which Chamberlain executed what was a masterful counter attack. In the midst of the noise and exhaustion he was able to communicate to his troops to make a coordinated sweeping bayonet charge starting with the end of his line forming a hinged hook that essentially created a flanking and frontal assault on the Confederate advance.  This move caught the Confederate army off guard who were also low on ammo and severally exhausted and beat up.  Chamberlain knew if he waited he would not survive another assault so he took the initiative. This saved the left flank and strengthened the Union line which eventually repelled the Confederate charge the following day and won this pivotal battle.

While much has been written on this aspect of the battle I think it important we do gain leadership insights that over 50,000 men paid with their lives in this battle.

Leadership is leadership … a book worm professor who has learned good leadership principals then checked his ego when given opportunity to lead asks to come up through ranks instead to gain lower level experience.  Take a challenge to lead something out of your realm of understanding and see that leadership principals are transferable.

Don’t wait till it is too late.  With most time critical endeavors there is usually a window of opportunity that will close.  Knowing what that is and then decisively jumping through the window when it opens is key.

Know the importance of your position understood the strategic significance of the small hill.  The Art of War by Sun Tzu stressed the key to gaining and keeping the high ground.  This takes many forms and mostly figurativley on struggles within a non-war enganement.  

Communicate it well and to help this keep it simple.  I can think of no more difficult circumstance in which to communicate than in all the noise and mayhem of this battle.  Chamberlain did it though and was able to communicate a coordinated movement of his troops starting with outer troops and rolling into a strangling hook against the Confederates.  In midst of the action we need to communicate simply and clearly to each member so they know their role.

 ”When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it.” – Henry Ford.  Chamberlain who was probably one more charge away from defeat turned into the wind and that made all the difference.

A Contradiction in Terms?

So often the biggest challenge in any leader is self-leadership.  History is littered with great promising leaders who failed to lead themselves and thus robbed their time and ours from what could have been.

Leadership is sometimes defined as motivating others to do something that they individually would of never done where the collective result is far greater than the sum of the individuals.

How do we apply that same concept to self-leadership, or is it a contradiction of terms?  I would like to propose that we look at part of self-leadership is the coordination or marshaling the efforts of mind, body, and soul to accomplish what they individually cannot.

Are we continually putting ourselves in a position to be challenged mentally?  Are we reading the best thinking in the areas we are engaged?  Are we pushing the envelope of what is thought as conventional wisdom?  I really cannot think of any great leaders who when you look behind them they were not veracious readers.  The list of self-taught leaders is extremely impressive with the likes of  the most prolific inventor of our age Thomas Edison who had 3 months of formal education. College drop outs Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, Alexander Graham Bell, broadcast legend Walter Cronkite and Michael Dell of Dell computer.  Others like author Charles Dickens who had to leave school in his teens to tend to family needs.

Taking care of the physical body in times past was challenging.  We have little excuse in many circumstances with modern medicine and nutrition and exercising.  This is truly a discipline of the individual. Thinking back to some notable figures who were caught by premature deaths probably avoidable by to today’s standard…, Alexander the Great who it is told that he once marched with his men with the back of his clothes cut open because he had diarrhea but wanted to keep marching.  While is it debated how he actually died it is thought to be ultimately of some form of gastric disorder from possibly drinking some bad wine or water.  President William Harrison who died 31 days into office from a cold he caught but did not take care to get rest needed due the pressing matters of his new Presidency.   It was said the White House was no place to rest… so he didn’t.

Lastly and probably the most devastating to our age is soul care.  The moral failings continue to pile up usually disqualifying them from leadership.  Borrowing from Alcohol Anonymous  dialog the solution to avoiding destructive actions is behavioral modification through spiritual progress.  Not necessarily intuitive but certainly demonstrated by many who have recovered from life destroying habits.  Watching the condition of our soul/spirit will also give us the courage and passion to balance the rest of our lives and engage those we lead with integrity.

Each of these areas require planning, time and follow through to be balanced and healthy.  So in the end self leadership is not just figuring out how to care for mind, body and soul but how to get the multiplication of leadership out of the coordination of the 3 to do more than the sum of each.

Choose your battles

Choose your battles … but once you choose fight with all diligence.

In all great struggles be they public or private there is a prioritization of conflict and battle. To ensure victory this often requires leaving some uncomfortable or even compromising situations left unsettled initially.

In the formative years of the United States the colonies had little or no Naval strength. In that day nations with strong Navies ruled the world. In order to protect precious cargo to and from other parts of the world, the US congress authorized funds for bribes to be paid to Moroccan pirates for protection. While this was a common practice it certainly instigated hearty debates with our ethically sensitive forefathers.

John Adams told Thomas Jefferson regarding the pirates, “We ought not fight them at all, unless we determine to fight them forever.”

This certainly is being played out in our time with the ongoing battle against terrorism. What areas of our struggles should the tough call be made to wait to fight another day while we focus on the critical battle at hand?