As you can a donkey…

The following was written by Epictetus of Nicopolis as a dialogue between himself and a fictional Roman Commander named Maximus around 112 AD.

Maximus: I sit as a judge over Greeks.

Epictetus: But do you know how to be a judge?  And what has given you this knowledge?

Maximus: The Emperor gave me my credentials…

Epictetus: And there is another question – that is, how did you come to be a judge?  Whose hand did you kiss?  In front of whose bedroom door did you sleep so as to be the first to say good morning? To whom did you send presents?…

Maximus: Well, I can throw anyone I want into prison.

Epictetus: Just as you can throw a stone away.

Maximus: And I can have anyone I want beaten to death with a club.

Epictetus: As you can a donkey.  That is not governing men.  Govern us as rational beings by pointing out what is useful to us and we will follow you.  Point out to us what is useless, and we will turn away from it.

Accepting Reality: Charles the Simple

… I will to my Lord, be true and faithful, and love all which he loves and shun all which he shuns, according to the laws of God and the order of the world. Nor will I ever with will or action, through word or deed, do anything which is unpleasing to him, on condition that he will hold to me as I shall deserve it, and that he will perform everything as it was in our agreement when I submitted myself to him and chose his will.

-Anglo Saxon Loyalty Oath, mid-10th Century

Charles III, or Charles the Simple, as he is called, was King of France in the early 10th Century.  His title of “Simple” comes from the belief of most of his contemporaries that he was a weak and insignificant King.  And while as King he did wield little real power or authority, he did manage to do something as King that left his family, his nation, and Western Civilization with a lasting legacy.  And it all came down to a desperate choice he made one year in the face of certain defeat.

By the summer of 911 Charles was in a battle for the very life of his Kingdom.  France, like the rest of Europe, had been under the terror of the Vikings.  Originating from Scandinavia, they would swoop in to raid and plunder towns, villages, and monasteries.  No ruler seemed to be able to stop or even hold them.  The “Norseman” as they were called had stronger weapons, faster ships, and in this case, were led by a vicious leader named Rollo who seemed to have no interest in peace.  The French had only Charles, a small army and no allies.

That’s when Charles came up with an idea.  He knew that he couldn’t fend off Rollo with his army & that he didn’t have enough cash to buy him off.  So Charles accepted that reality and made Rollo an offer, “come join me”.

Later that year, Charles and Rollo signed the Treaty of Sainte-Clair-sur-Epte.  Under the terms of the treaty, Rollo was given land in northern France & a title of Nobility, while Charles gained an ally and defender against future Viking invaders.  At the time it probably seemed crazy for Charles to give up land to a Viking, But Charles made a bet that Rollo might start to enjoy life as a noble, with better food, steady income, and the legitimacy of a title.  And he did.

Rollo and his descendents began to give up their Viking ways.  Eventually the Norsemen became the Northmen who then became the Normans.  Over the next 300 years the Normans became more and more European by becoming Christians, building towns, schools, and churches, and turned their land into one of the most prosperous regions in the Middle Ages.  Normans became some of the most cultured and productive people in France.  The land given to the Normans still bears the name, Normandy, a French province.

And for Charles, it ended up saving his family.  Not long after the treaty was signed, Duke Randolph of Burgundy rebelled, took the throne, and sent Charles to prison where he died in 929.  Charles’ wife Odgiva and son Louis were given refuge by the Normans.  In 936, Randolph was deposed and Louis was given the throne, all with the support and backing of the Normans.  Louis reigned as King Louis IV and with Norman support, gave France 19 years of stability and safety.

You see, sometimes leaders find themselves in very difficult circumstances where total “victory” just isn’t an option.  When Charles found himself there, he did what he had to do: accept the reality that the Vikings were not going away.  Once he did, he was able to effectively deal with Rollo and offer him a chance to be a part of France.  At the time it probably seemed crazy, but it was really all he could do.  So he did it.  And in the long run, it saved France from total annihilation, gave his son a much needed ally, and gave the world the Normans.

So as a leader, ask yourself a question.  What realities or “Vikings” do you need to accept and deal with if you’re going to move forward?  It may not be easy, but it may be the only thing you can do.

The Pizzaro Principle

“…in order that you may know Him and come out from the bestial and diabolical life that you lead…. Our Lord permitted that your pride should be brought low and that no Indian should be able to offend a Christian.” -Francisco Pizzaro, speaking to the captured Incan Emperor Atahualpa, 1532

Francisco Pizarro was a perfect Conquistador.  He was greedy, well-armed, willing to take risks, violent, ruthless, and… unbelievably lucky.  By 1535 he had pulled off perhaps the quickest and most complete conquest in world history by conquering the massive and powerful Inca Empire in South America. Traditionally, the credit for the conquest is given to Pizarro for his bold moves, his superior weapons & horses, and the “primitive” resistance of the Inca.  And while it is true that Pizarro did have the guts, guns, and horses, he also had something that helped him as a leader more than any horse or gun: luck.

Lucky break 1: The Inca’s had a naïve King.  His name was Atahualpa and he was never supposed to be King… but, as Lucky break 2 will show, he ended up winning the job by default.  Shortly after learning of the Spanish invasion, he sought a meeting with Pizarro in what would turn out to be an abandoned town (see Lucky break 3).  When he arrived, he came with only a few unarmed guards.  Pizarro had him quickly surrounded and easily took him hostage.

Lucky break 2: Atahualpa and his brother/cousin Huascar had just finished fighting a long & brutal civil war where Atahualpa won, just barely.  Inca custom encouraged royal family members marry each other. This often led to weird internal dynamics, family feuding, and some eventual mental retardation (see Lucky Break 1).  The war between the two brother/cousins had stretched the Inca army all over the Pacific coast and into the interiors of the Andes Mountains.  Years of constant warfare and being on the move had depleted the army and left it tired, spread out, and demoralized.  When Pizzaro met the Inca in battle, he wasn’t fighting against the best of the best, he was fighting against the survivors.

Lucky break 3: Smallpox.  New research suggests that between 1492 and 1550, somewhere between 60-70% of the population of North and South America died due to smallpox.  No joke, 60-70%.  The reason Atahualpa and Pizarro met in an abandoned town was because so many Incans had simply died.  Entire communities vanished and died out due to the people having no natural defense against the virus.  The empire had been crippled by disease and was already on the verge of collapse.

That’s why Pizarro won.  His conquest illustrates a key leadership principle: not every high level leader with lots of success gets there through hard work, talent, or determination.  Sometimes, they just get really lucky.

Let your Pilgrims go.

Having undertaken, for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith, and honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one of another, covenant and combine our selves together…”  William Bradford, Mayflower Compact, 1640.

Today we celebrate the Pilgrims as pioneers who came to America and befriended the Natives and gave us the great Holiday of Thanksgiving where we honor them by eating lots of food and watching football.  But 300 years ago, the Pilgrims were about the last people in earth who would throw a party – they believed in a very strict legalistic and authoritarian way of life that would make the townspeople in Footloose look like drunks at Mardi Gras.  The Pilgrim/Puritan worldview sprung from a combination of Calvinist theology, a distrust of the Royal House of Stuart, & an active opposition to anything in church life that resembled Roman Catholicism.  In short, the Puritans were angry at almost everyone but themselves.  So what’s a King to do?

LET THEM GO.  England in the early 1600’s had the good fortune to have lots of available real estate across the Atlantic in New England.  They also had the good leadership sense to give permission to any other religious dissenters to pack up and move thousands of miles away.  Having a release valve for angry subjects gave England much needed social stability for generations, as well as a way to end up having the gratitude of otherwise very angry people who now had some loyalty to you for the chance to have a new home.  Compare that to France & Spain who would only let subjects in good standing go to the New World – England had larger colonies, more successful colonies, and very little religious trouble at home.

So as a leader, are there folks in your ranks who just need permission to leave?  If they aren’t happy, don’t force them to stay and hope they “come around.”  Find your own leadership New England and offer them a chance to go somewhere new and make their own way.

White Paper War

“We will fight the White Paper as if there is no war, and fight the war as if there is no White Paper.” -David Ben-Gurion, Head of the Jewish Agency for Palestine in September 1939 (he later became Israel’s 1st Prime Minister)

1939 was not a good year to be a Jew.  In Continental Europe, Nazi Germany was embarking on systematic genocide of Jews and in Great Britain, a combination of Anti-Semitism and a desire for Arab support in the war effort against Germany created the famous “White Papers”.  The White Papers were laws passed in Britain that limited Jewish immigration to Palestine and gave local Arabs the right to control land, travel, and transport for Jewish refugees from Europe.  The British Government was desperate to appease and have the support of the Arab population in the Middle East during the war and so it enacted the White Papers to the frustration of Jews in the British Empire and beyond.

So if you’re a Jewish leader in 1939 what do you do?  You do something unique.  Why?  Because you have to.  Ben-Gurion decided to launch a 2 front movement with the Zionist movement.  It would strongly support the British/Allied cause in World War 2 and simultaneously disregard and circumvent British Authority when it came to the White Papers.  Jews were smuggled into Palestine every way possible and at the same time Jews served in the British Army fighting Germany all the way to 1945.  Finally, in 1948 Israel became a sovereign nation led by Ben-Gurion.

In leadership, you may find yourself in situations where people need clarity, even when it’s not easy to provide.  Ben-Gurion set out to define for Jews a reality, fuzzy, but HONEST.  For 7 years they worked at 2 seemingly opposing strategies but ultimately leading to one goal.  Sometimes people just need honesty, even when it’s confusing.

Conquer through Competition

“No wild beast is as dangerous to man as one Christian is to another.” – Julian the Apostate

Towards the end of the Roman Empire, one of the nephews of Constantine the Great, Julian, took the throne as the Augustus Emperor. He inherited an empire with some serious problems, namely the Parthian Empire (modern Iraq/Iran) was causing trouble, and Christianity was giving him fits.

Julian was a devout pagan who rejected the Christian faith and believed, like many others in Rome, that the decline of Imperial power was linked to the rise in Christianity. Julian took the throne and quickly went about restoring pagan Roman religion. And naturally, many Christians resisted and began causing problems for Julian – problems that he did not need. Soon the Parthians invaded

So how did Julian handle his Christian enemies? He gave them total freedom. Seriously. Earlier Emperors had played favorites with particular Christian sects and gave them special rights while outlawing and condemning other Christian sects. Julian gave all Christians, no matter what they believed or how they practiced their faith, total freedom and protection. He predicted that once the Christians could do as they pleased, they’d instantly turn on each other instead of being united against him.

It worked. Julian’s policy of total Christian toleration was the most liberal and generous religious policy in the late Empire. And after about a year of the policy, Julian had no further issues, uprisings, or problems with Christianity. He was able to concentrate on fighting off the Parthians and securing the borders of the eastern Empire.

Julian understood something that many leaders forget: often times our opponents will defeat themselves… if we let them. Julian gave Christians just enough rope to hang themselves with internal squabbling. It allowed him to concentrate on what he HAD to do instead of being pulled into minor distractions. The concept of a united opposition is all too often a myth.

An army in the field

Discipline is the soul of an army. It makes the small numbers formidable; procures success to the weak and esteem to all. — George Washington

During the Revolutionary War, the American effort for Independence from Great Britain hung on 2 factors.  The first was the Continental Congress which worked to create a government and raise money for the new Republic and the second was the Continental Army, commanded by George Washington.  Washington faced a daunting task.  He was pitted against the greatest military power the world had even known, the British Empire with a seemingly unlimited amount of ships, troops, weapons, commanders, and money.  Yes, Washington was a good general, but there was 1 of him and about 50 British Generals who had gained experience fighting Spain, France, and the Native Americans.

To win the war, Washington understood that it was crucially important to win the public relations battle in the colonies.  Namely, he had to make sure his army was never totally defeated.  If his army was totally defeated and he was forced to surrender, there would be no army to replace him and the the colonists would lose heart.  So even though he was willing to lose battles, he always made sure he avoided fights that would lead him to total disaster.  He figured if he kept the army in the field, in the fight, then the colonists would stay hopeful, and the Continental Congress would have an easier time raising money.

History proved Washington right.  France intervened and matched Britain’s resources and helped win the war.  Even in an extremely difficult situation, and even when you’re losing – there is something important about keeping an army in the field.  Leaders with more brains and less power can outlast opponents/situations with more power